|
I-Share Users’ Group Meeting Minutes March 20, 2008 Conference call Members Attending: Sarah Mc-Hone Chase, Xiaotian Chen, Keith Eiten, Tom Goetz, Stephanie Graves, Carlos Melian, Larissa Moebs, Carol Reid, Paula Garrett, Stephen Smith Members Absent: David Bell, Dallas Long Guest: Sara Cook CARLI Staff Attending: Lorna Engels, Paige Weston Next meeting: April 25, 2008 in Champaign CARLI Board Report: No new I-Share libraries in 2009 Resource Sharing task force recommendations approved RFP for ERMS approved, but no timeline Team Reports: - Acquisitions & Serials Team
- No report, conference call later today
- Cataloging and Authority Control Team
- Spring Forum Wed Apr 9 at Kankakee
- Includes RDA, FRBR updates
- Panel discussions on recommendations
- Break out: Issues on work flow in I-Share
- Joint ICAT-IACQ proposal for program on work flow, still in discussion
- Resource Sharing Team
- April 16 Forum at UIS
- New views and tools for I-Share
- Resource Sharing Task force updates
- Instruction Team
- Sub groups meeting, tutorials and forums
- Planning phase of a Forum after ALA in July, Web 2.0 for instruction (gaming, blogs, ITunes, etc)
- OPAC Team
- Test script almost done, waiting for upgrade schedule
CARLI Office report: - Not integrate WRO into tickets, has to do with streamlining CARLI workflow
- Preparing for ORACLE upgrade
- Office move will take place in May
Agenda Discussion: - I-Share Liaison Forum
- Look at suggested topics for next year, focus on things that don’t fit a team
- Several suggested Reports Forum
- Mentors program worked well
- SFX training may be set up for summer
- ILDS empty bags discussion referred to ILDS discussion list
- Ex Libris announcement :
- will allow link to Google Book Search in Voyager upgrade, this is a voluntary option
- Send items to Larissa for year end report (due in June)
- Document Delivery Options—went to Product vetting committee and then to CARLI staff to evaluate, PALCI uses RAPID and Carlos suggested CARLI staff discuss with them, other investigations indicate that records are not ‘clean’ enough to integrate, small libraries may find this difficult to use but large libraries see a consortium-wide purchase as very advantageous
|